Global buyer checklistBefore payment or production release

China supplier due diligence: six checks before payment.

Run six separate checks: legal identity, authority, factory capability, order fit, payment path and release decision. Keep one dated record for each lane, then state whether the buyer should continue, hold or escalate. No single “verified” badge can answer all six.

· · 9-minute read · Official links checked 30 July 2026

Prepared by Bao L. Zhou, Currawong’s China-side verification desk for international buyers.

Also available in العربية, Deutsch, Español, Français, Bahasa Indonesia, Italiano, 日本語, 한국어, Nederlands, Polski, Português, Русский, ไทย, Türkçe and Tiếng Việt.

DUE DILIGENCE / 01

Build the evidence file before you need the verdict.

A supplier due diligence checklist — vendor due diligence checklist, in most procurement playbooks — should produce separate evidence for legal identity, transaction authority, manufacturing capability, product and order fit, the payment path and the next release decision.

A supplier can have a current registration record and still be the wrong factory for your order. A capable factory can still send unexplained payment instructions. A matching beneficiary can still ship a non-conforming product. Keep those questions separate so one positive signal cannot silently stand in for the rest.

01

Establish the exact legal identity

Get the current business licence, Chinese legal name and 18-character Unified Social Credit Code. Search the National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System and note the date. Compare the name, code, status, address and listed representatives with the supplied documents.

The State Council’s market-entity registration regulation provides the registration framework. A public-record match establishes a registered identity; it does not establish reliability, factory control, product compliance or payment safety. If you arrived from the broader question is ordering from Alibaba safe?, most of the answer sits in the order terms, not the registry.

Use the step-by-step company registration check →

Read how annual reports, abnormal-list entries and penalties remain dated public-record signals →

See our 46-company measurement of capital, status and scope fields →

02

Check who can act for each company

List who quotes, signs the contract, issues the invoice and exports the goods. Record their company names and known contact details. Ask for a written explanation of each different entity. Put its role in the contract.

Check material changes with a contact you knew before the change. A stamp image, forwarded email or chat account cannot confirm authority on its own. If you still do not know who can act, pause the decision and seek advice for your transaction.

Keep the public legal-representative field separate from the deal signatory →

03

Check whether the factory can fulfil your order

Identify the company and the actual production site separately. Ask who runs the key processes, which equipment is used and what is outsourced. Check the claimed capacity against your order. Use evidence for your product type.

ISO does not certify companies; independent bodies do. Check the certificate’s holder, issuer, site, scope, dates and status. Use IAF CertSearch where records are available. A management-system certificate does not certify your product or prove that this order meets its specification.

Use the five-layer factory capability workflow →

Use the seven-check certificate and test-report workflow →

04

Agree the product and the evidence you need

Agree the specification and approved sample. Record materials, tolerances, labels and packaging. Set the inspection method, acceptance criteria and rules for changes. Give each required test or document an owner and version.

Check the rules for your product and destination with the relevant regulator or a qualified adviser. A supplier certificate does not transfer your duties to the supplier. Check which models, materials and shipments it covers.

Booking an inspection answers a different question: an inspection tells you what is in the cartons. It does not tell you which company you contracted with or where the money went.

Order-specific boundary

A supplier-level review cannot replace product testing, shipment inspection or the regulatory evidence required for the destination market.

Turn the approved seller, specification and evidence into a controlled PO baseline →

Turn the finished lot and inspection report into a buyer-owned release decision →

05

Match the payee to the contract

Compare the registered supplier, contract seller, invoice issuer and bank beneficiary. Ask about each mismatch before payment. The People’s Bank of China source below describes account-name consistency for a mainland China unit account.

A trading company, export agent or affiliate may have a valid role. Get documents that explain it. Check changed bank details through a known contact, using details obtained separately from the change request. The FBI warns about this pattern in business email compromise.

Whether the counterparty can absorb a problem is separate from whether the money path is consistent. Different records answer it: see what a Chinese supplier’s public record can and cannot say about financial risk.

Use the six-check bank-account workflow →

06

Record your next decision

Every completed item needs an owner, a dated source, an unresolved-exception field and a next decision. Use “continue”, “hold”, “escalate” or another internally defined state instead of a vague pass mark.

Name the action you can take now: request a sample, approve a contract, pay an invoice, release production or accept a shipment. Each later decision needs its own review.

For a formal approval file, check the company named on the contract and payment records. A certificate cannot establish that link.

A name-search result is still a candidate. The single-result study shows why you must compare the Chinese legal name and credit code with the licence, contract and payee.

MEASURED / CURRENT IS NOT THE SAME AS EVER

Check historical records as well as current status

On 21 August 2026, we queried seven historical-record categories for 45 company candidates selected from an NHTSA manufacturer list. The 315 calls completed without a recorded request failure. A completed request does not prove complete record coverage.

Historical registry dimensions returning at least one record, across 45 manufacturers. Queried 21 August 2026.
Historical dimensionCompanies with a recordShare
Prior registration details (name, address, scope)40 of 4589%
Prior shareholders33 of 4573%
Prior outbound investments9 of 4520%
Prior operating anomalies3 of 457%
Prior judicial assistance2 of 454%
Prior administrative penalties1 of 452%
Prior administrative licences0 of 450%
Historical registry dimensions returning at least one record, across 45 manufacturers. Queried 21 August 2026. Prior registration details (name, address, scope): 40 of 45; Prior shareholders: 33 of 45; Prior outbound investments: 9 of 45; Prior operating anomalies: 3 of 45; Prior judicial assistance: 2 of 45; Prior administrative penalties: 1 of 45; Prior administrative licences: 0 of 45.
Historical registry dimensions returning at least one record, across 45 manufacturers. Queried 21 August 2026.

Five of these 45 candidates returned at least one historical anomaly, judicial-assistance or penalty record. The categories overlap. This is not a representative sample of Chinese suppliers, and the records do not establish current risk or whether a past issue was resolved.

A previous name, address or shareholder is not a verdict. Compare the dated record with the documents for your order and ask about any difference that affects the contracting entity.

For your supplier file: record both current and relevant historical results, their dates and unresolved differences. An empty result may reflect the provider’s coverage; it does not prove that no event occurred.

See the sample selection and lookup method. The figures above count companies with returned records, not confirmed factories or approved suppliers.

CONTROL SHEET / 02

Stacked diagram of six evidence lines from base to top: identity with exact Chinese legal name and USCI, registration record, certificates matched on holder model site and expiry, factory relationship between entity and claimed site, transaction documents in agreement, and the payment chain where money moves
A reference map for linking identity, documents and payment evidence. Use the six-lane control sheet below for your order. Original Currawong diagram.

The minimum record for each evidence lane

Evidence laneMinimum recordCommon unresolved exceptionDecision affected
Legal identityChinese name, credit code, dated registry result and supplied licenceRecord is absent, inactive, changed or inconsistentWhether to continue identity review
Transaction authorityContracting entity, signatory, known contact and entity-role mapSeller, invoice issuer or agent role is unexplainedWhether to approve the contract or instruction
Manufacturing capabilitySite, process, equipment, capacity, subcontracting and certificate scopeEvidence belongs to another site, model or companyWhether to sample, audit or place the order
Product and order fitControlled specification, sample, inspection plan and destination evidence ownerTest, model, material or acceptance criterion is missingWhether to release production or shipment
Payment pathContract, invoice, beneficiary, bank route and change confirmationDifferent or newly changed receiving entityWhether to release a specific payment
Next release decisionReviewer, date, evidence version, open exceptions and authorised actionEvidence is stale or the requested action exceeds its scopeContinue, hold or escalate

Recheck before the next commitment

Recheck the affected evidence when you add a supplier or change the contract, product or bank details. Check again before you release production, pay or accept goods. Set review dates for your order; the file is not a permanent approval.

A prior clean result is historical evidence. It is not proof that the company, factory, product, email instruction or bank account remains unchanged.

If those refreshes feed a scorecard and do not just sit in a file, note which row cannot come from your own order history. Quality, delivery and cost do, but legal standing is the scorecard row most often guessed.

Add the checks for your destination

Use this core checklist in any market. Add the rules and advice for your product and destination. For Australia, the Australia-specific checklist is a regional add-on with import, product-safety and biosecurity sources.

Do not replace the global identity, capability or payment lanes with a destination checklist. They answer different questions and should remain separately dated.

METHOD / 03

How this checklist was prepared

Currawong’s China-side verification desk reviewed the official sources below on 30 July 2026. GSXT and the State Council source support the registered-identity lane. ISO and IAF support the certification-scope boundary. PBOC supports the mainland unit-account naming point. The FBI source supports independent confirmation of changed payment details.

The six-lane control sheet is our synthesis of those narrow sources and practical order controls. We did not inspect any reader’s supplier, site, product, certificate, contract, bank account or transaction. This is general evidence-organising guidance. It is neither legal, banking, compliance, inspection nor sourcing advice.

PRIMARY SOURCES / 04

Official sources used for this checklist

Links and page content were checked on 30 July 2026. Re-open the current source before a material decision because public records, certificates and procedures can change.

COMMON QUESTIONS / 05

Keep the answer tied to the decision

Is a valid Chinese business licence enough?
No. It supports a registered identity at a point in time. Factory control, order capability, product evidence and the payment path need separate checks.
Does an ISO certificate prove product compliance?
No. Check the certificate type, site, scope, issuer, accreditation and status. A management-system certificate is not product certification or order acceptance evidence.
Can a trading company be a valid supplier?
Yes, if the evidence fits your order. Check its identity, role, link to the factory, duties under the contract and payment path. The “trading company” label alone does not decide this.
How does this fit a formal supplier approval program?
Use the six checks as inputs to your approval file. Your program still needs its own criteria, review dates and authorised decision-maker. This checklist does not set your thresholds or approve a supplier.
When should the checklist be refreshed?
Recheck when a company, specification, site, certificate or payment instruction changes. Review again before you approve the next step, such as production or payment.
Will this checklist tell me that a supplier is safe?
No. It helps you record the evidence, gaps and next steps. You still need to review your own order and seek qualified advice where needed.

BUILD THE RECORD

Turn the checklist into a dated scope before money moves.

Request a public-record identity check or select the evidence modules needed for a Supplier Evidence Report. You review the scope first. Neither action charges you, starts fulfilment or declares a supplier safe.

How we checked

Fill rates come from running our report process on real companies and counting how many of the twelve dimensions returned data on the date stated. The most recent query date on this page is 21 August 2026. Where a table carries its own date, that date governs.

The official pages we read are listed on this page with the date each was accessed, so every figure can be re-checked at source.

Being pushed to pay a deposit right now? The checks that matter before money moves take about ten minutes and cost nothing.

If you want these records pulled for your own supplier: the “The full picture before a contract” selection of the report menu covers them, packs from $26.55. Delivery follows the window on your order confirmation. Buying from a Chinese seller of record is the other route entirely. Its own choice, its own trade-offs.